ACIS RESEARCHAI Civilization Investment Research · Personalized Research中文

P2 · W7 · Entirely fictional client sample

No rebalance this week; review technology overlap

Down 0.60%, versus 1.18% for the policy benchmark. Holdings remain unchanged; gold and cash cushioned losses, while technology overlap still needs review.

Observation: 30 October close to 6 November close, 2026. Published 9 November.

One-minute decision board

NAV USD$970,106.32
Cash10.52%
StatusReview

No new trades, zero turnover and $0 new implementation cost this week.

Three comparison paths

ACIS simulation-0.60%
Original buy-and-hold-0.60%
Policy benchmark-1.18%

Versus original: 0.00 percentage points; versus policy: 0.58 percentage points. Policy: 60% SPY, 30% SGOV, 10% GLD; reconstructed reference for S01.

Original and current holdings

SecurityInitial weightCurrent weight
SPY25%25.02%
QQQ15%14.40%
MSFT10%11.01%
GOOG10%8.57%
IEF10%10.43%
SGOV10%10.30%
GLD10%9.74%
Cash10%10.52%

P2 and P2-S01 have independent ledgers. S01 W0–W2 is a historical reconstruction.

Next step and invalidation

Do not turn a one-week decline automatically into an addition signal. Review overlap among SPY, QQQ and direct technology stocks, with a 12% direct-stock limit and 8% weekly gross turnover cap.

Missing/conflicting prices, a suspension, negative cash, insufficient shares or a budget breach cancel the whole simulation ticket without automatic rollover. Target allocations do not establish current compliance.

Risk and data limitations

Maximum within-week daily-close drawdown: 2.54%; Daily-return sample SD: 1.63% (n=5). Not annualized; intraday risk is excluded. Full-history metrics remain unresolved.

Public regular-session closes are used, with distributions separately booked. This case received $669.75 of SGOV and IEF distributions. Cash earns no interest; tax is not modeled. Not all prices have two-source verification.

Questions

Any trades this week?

No. Previously booked simulated fills are not repeated. The next plan is excluded from this week’s returns.

Is this real client performance?

No. People, holdings and trades are fictional tests. Short-term results do not establish long-term skill.

Is all historical data verified?

No. Early prices, decision timestamps and full-history risk metrics remain unresolved. The S01 policy benchmark is reconstructed.